Thursday, 13 February 2014

Bitcoin set to disrupt SA market



Big players in SA are gearing up to support transactions via Bitcoin.
Big players in SA are gearing up to support transactions via Bitcoin.
The use of Bitcoin in SA – as an alternative to the rand – is set to take off as more services are created, awareness grows, and mainstream online stores start accepting the virtual currency.
This will disrupt traditional financial payment systems, which are seen as costly and outdated. Yet, wide-spread adoption of Bitcoin is not without its hindrances, such as the time a transaction takes to settle, hack attacks, and possible interference by government regulators.
Bitcoin was created as an alternative to physical currency in January 2009 by Satoshi Nakamoto, although there are doubts as to whether this is his real name. The virtual currency allows users to send payments within a decentralised, peer-to-peer networkwithout the need for a clearing house. However, unlike banks, Bitcoin third-party accounts are not regulated.
Click here
By design, the supply of Bitcoins cannot exceed 21 million and there are more than 12.4 million units currently in circulation, according to Bitcoincharts, a Web site that tracks activity across exchanges.
Sonya Kuhnel, founder of local entity Bitcoin Payments, says the fact that it is so cheap, secure and quick to do Bitcoin transactions is appealing to developing countries, such as SA.
Kuhnel says, although in its infancy, Bitcoin is attracting the big players. "Even with the volatility of the Bitcoin price and the recent negative media coverage Bitcoin is getting, people still believe the digital currency is here to stay and make a huge impact on how we do business in the future."
Virtual currencies represent one of the most important technical and economic innovations of our time and are redefining payment systems, says Kuhnel. "Digital currencies introduce advancements in electronic payments and money transfers, reducing costs for business around the world, lowering the risk of fraud, increasing consumer privacy and expanding the market for consumer financial products in a worldwide basis."
Bitcoin enthusiast Haroun Kola says a growth in awareness, continued currency volatility, more services and more outlets at which to spend Bitcoins will boost is popularity. He adds services such as 37 Coins, which allows users to trade via SMS, will also extend the currency's reach in SA, which has a low level of Internet penetration.
Kola notes SA tends to be two to three years behind global trends, but the currency is primed to gain traction locally. He says when its benefits are extended to the unbanked it will take off in a "big way".
Additional outlets to spend the currency, such as through online retailers, will also speed up adoption, says Kola. He anticipates a site such as Kalahari.com offering the option in six months' time.
Despite its promise, use of the currency is still quite small locally, with only between 10 and 20 coins exchanged each day, notes Kola. He says although this provides an indication of the size of the market, it is not an accurate depiction of the user base, for which no figures are available.
According to CoinDesk, Bitcoins are currently trading at $647.23, giving the virtual currency a $8 billion market capitalisation.
Although the amount of trades pales in comparison to stock moves on the JSE, for example, Kola says the currency is gaining traction. He notes that meetings by punters in Cape Town attract hundreds of people. "It's definitely growing."
Kuhnel adds the South African Reserve Bank has indicated it has no objection to the use of the currency and is not considering any legislation on digital currencies. "Will Bitcoin become the foundation of a new global financial system? Who knows where it will go, but it is certainly very disruptive to traditional and costly payment systems."
Bank of America Merrill Lynch says Bitcoins are set to grow globally and will account for more than 10% of the e-commerce market. "We believe Bitcoin could become a major means of payment for e-commerce and may emerge as a serious competitor to traditional money-transfer providers. As a medium of exchange, Bitcoin has clear potential for growth."
However, Bitcoin has been receiving negative attention lately, after a massive cyber attack from unknown sources spammed exchanges. Reuters reports this highlights some of the dangers people can encounter when they exchange cash for digital currencies like Bitcoin.
The distributed denial-of-service attack involved thousands of phantom transactions, forcing at least three of the online platforms that store Bitcoins to halt withdrawals until they can determine which transactions were real, it noted.
The attack exposed the higher risks involved in owning and trading the instrument, compared with the dollar and other traditional currencies, said Reuters, adding Bitcoins slumped in value as a result of the disruptions.
Bank of America Merrill Lynch says while personal accounts are easy to secure, start-up exchanges in overseas jurisdictions with online digital wallets are often targeted by hackers. "Exchanges also have some risk of the operator absconding with the money before the currency conversion is completed," it says in a December report on the currency.
Kola adds that while Bitcoins may be susceptible to cyber crime, and have been used to deal in drugs, this is a challenge that faces many currencies. Kuhnel says the challenge is for people to trust that Bitcoin holds a store of value and offers benefits such as being cheaper to trade than actual cash.
Bitcoin will need a few years for merchants, big industry and people to trust this technology, adds Kuhnel.
The Bank of America Merrill Lynch report also notes disadvantages, such as its elevated price volatility, the possible introduction of regulatory controls that could increase the transaction cost, security concerns over the Bitcoin exchanges, the 50-minute clearing time, and the fact that the currency is not "legal" tender.

What You Need to Know About Mt. Gox and the Bitcoin Software Flaw

By Morgen Peck
Photo: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg/Getty Images
Here's what a terrible week looks like in the world of Bitcoin: Two of the most trafficked Bitcoin exchanges, Mt. Gox and Bitstamp, temporarily halt tradingand suspend bitcoin withdrawals in the midst of a distributed denial of service attack (DDoS). On exchanges that are still open for business, the value of the currency takes a brutal, sudden hit and then continues to tumble. Bitcoin users notice strange errors in their wallet balances after making routine transactions. Rumor spreads that the Bitcoin protocol is critically flawed. And where rumor is lacking, conspiracy theories abound.
All this, and it's barely Thursday.
Some of it is true. Some of it is half true. Some of it is completely false. Here is what's really going on.
Mt. Gox, which until recently was the most trafficked of the Bitcoin exchanges, is at the center of this mess. Whether they actually caused it is a separate question and still up for debate. Either way, they've been in the Bitcoin doghouse for at least a year now, during which time they have been reliably generating bad Bitcoin press. Many traders who frequent the online exchange choose to leave some of their money (both bitcoin and fiat) in an account set up by the company. Keeping the money on site allows clients to do quick trades, but people are beginning to wonder whether Mt. Gox can be trusted to be responsible with the funds they have.
Last May,confidence was shaken by the news that the Department of Homeland Security had seized the Dwolla e-payments account of Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpeles and accused him of operating without the proper license. After the loss of this currency conduit, customers began reporting long delays withdrawing dollars from their Mt. Gox accounts. Poor communication fomented a deep mistrust in the exchange and people began to wonder whether Mt. Gox might have squandered its clients' money. And now, as of last Friday, Mt. Gox customers can't even withdraw bitcoins.
In a statement on its website, Mt. Gox claimed that it had identified a serious flaw in the Bitcoin protocol, one that behooved it to cease transactions until developers could find a solution. Conspiracy theories immediately followed. Several people implored Mt. Gox to somehow verify the solvency of their exchange. (One guy even staked out the office in Japan to confront Karpeles himself.) But the mob lowered its pitchforks after core Bitcoin developers announced that the flaw Mt. Gox outlined does indeed exist. It's called transaction malleability, and according to Bitcoin developers, it does need to be fixed.
"Generally, malleability is a design flaw in Bitcoin, albeit a very subtle one. So we can forgive Satoshi for overlooking it," says Mike Hearn, a developer who works on the Bitocin protocol. (Satoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonym for the inventor of the Bitcoin protocol.)
In order to understand transaction malleability, you need to know that the balances of all Bitcoin addresses are maintained on a public ledger and that the changes made to this ledger are what constitute the transfer of funds.
When a transaction is broadcast to the network, it is relayed with a digital fingerprint that identifies it. Bitcoin miners then scoop it up, verify it, and send it on to the rest of the network for confirmation. Once the transaction has been confirmed, there is no way for that same person to spend those same bitcoins because they are being checked against the public ledger.
The malleability feature allows a person to intervene, right after the transaction request has been sent, modify the fingerprint and create a duplicate transaction. So, now you have two unconfirmed transactions flying around the network. They are both for the exact same payment, but they have different fingerprints and only one of them can be added to the public ledger. "The first one that is confirmed will be accounted for in the blockchain and will become the definitive record," says Andreas Antonopoulos, the chief security officer for the Blockchain.info Bitcoin wallet. "The other will be dropped as a double spend attempt."
It's when the mutated version gets added that we start to have problems. It turns out that when Mt. Gox needs to verify that a transaction has gone through, it scans the public ledger for confirmations on the fingerprint that the transaction generated. If its software doesn't see it, it assumes that the payment was not successfully sent. There are other, more reliable ways to set up the accounting, but from the little explanation Mt. Gox has given, this seems to be how its running its operation.
Using transaction malleability, it seems that some Mt. Gox customers were able to pull off a version of refund fraud, says Antonopoulos. Mt. Gox is claiming that some customers requested a bitcoin transaction and were able to quickly change the fingerprint on the transaction, making it looks like it hadn't gone through. When they returned to Mt. Gox to complain, the exchange would agree to send payment again.
But it's not just a headache for the exchanges. Malleability can also cause problems for people who conduct multiple Bitcoin transactions in rapid succession, causing some transactions to be voided and wallet balances to get out of sync with what's reflected in the network. In essence, however, this is an accounting problem. It is not possible to use this flaw to steal or misdirect Bitcoins that you do not own.
"What these are are phantom transactions that don't effect the balance but can fool your wallet into thinking that it has less than it has—which is scary but harmless," says Antonopoulos.
If you are using Bitcoin right now, it's quite possible that this will effect you. Shortly after Mt. Gox shined a spotlight on the problem, someone rushed to capitalize on it. The whole network is now experiencing a massive DDoS attack from a collection of rogue nodes that are working to change transaction fingerprints.
Every wallet will deal with this differently. Antonopoulos's Blockchain.info wallet (which Apple just yanked from the iOS app store) interprets the event as a double spend attempt and alerts users accordingly. But, in all cases, the effects can be mitigated by simply waiting ten minutes between each payment.
Hearn says that coming up with a complete fix is a long-term goal. In the meantime, exchanges will have to change their implementation to account for mutated transactions—something which some exchanges already do. Antonopoulos says he expects Bitstamp to be up and running by next week.
It will be very interesting to see what happens when Mt. Gox re-opens. With all of the mischief they've created and ill-will they've inspired, a lot of people are going to be looking to get out as soon as they have the chance, and I expect them to do everything they can to avoid a bank run.
"They have to handle their return path very carefully," says Antonopoulos. "They've burnt the credibility that would give them enough breathing room to do it right."
But when it comes to the Bitcoin protocol and the currency itself, Antonopoulos is not worried at all. In fact, he says, "attacks make it more resilient."

Wednesday, 12 February 2014


Major Multinational Bank Trials Integration with Bitcoin

 (@southtopia) | Published on February 12, 2014 at 14:00 GMT | CompaniesNews,RegulationTechnology
Share26
A company called Switchless says it has developed a “fully operational and integrated bitcoin portal system for a large multinational bank”, currently being run as an internal pilot.
The news leaked out after the system was showcased at Finovate Europe2014, which was held from 11th – 12th February in London. The software is reportedly being trialled by South Africa’s Standard Bank, the largest in Africa.
This is first time a major bank has trialled a bitcoin integration system, and Switchless says it is pleased with the results so far. All that is required for full deployment at this stage is a regulators’ approval, which the companies are hoping to receive in the coming weeks.

Banks and bitcoin

This news will come as a surprise to many. Not only have most major banks and money transfer businesses avoided involvement with bitcoin, some have been downright hostile by closing accounts with any discernible link to cryptocurrencies.
Official trading platforms and exchanges operated by big banks would give bitcoin mainstream legitimacy like no startup could, and they could easily out-compete smaller independent exchanges for customers. There might even be the potential for partnerships and acquisitions in that space.
Switchless itself is headquartered in Singapore. Its website states:
“Switchless develops enterprise bitcoin software for leading global banks, private wealth managers and brokerage firms, making it easy for them to bring bitcoin to their customers. Our internationally mobile teams are highly experienced in the design and implementation of financial software and crypto-currency platforms.”

Africa’s largest bank

The Standard Bank of South Africa, part of the Standard Bank Group, is headquartered in Johannesburg and is Africa’s largest bank with over 53,000 employees. Founded in 1863, in 2012 it had headline earnings of US$1.8bn and total assets of $183bn.
Finovate is a two-day showcase of cutting-edge innovations in the financial and banking industry, including both large corporations and smaller startups such as Switchless. The first Finovate Europe in 2013 attracted over 740 attendees.

Tuesday, 4 February 2014

Bitcoin gets two hearings - and steps closer to acceptance



January 30, 2014: 2:59 PM ET

Upbeat meetings organized by banks and regulators indicate the cryptocurrency is moving toward integration with traditional services -- and will likely face new compliance requirements.

By David Z. Morris
140130114536-bitcoin-wallet-620xaFORTUNE -- In a space of two days, one of the largest consumer banks in the U.S. and the state regulatory agency that often sets the baseline for nationwide financial regulation held fact-finding events about the peer-to-peer cryptocurrency bitcoin. Bitcoin has been the focus of intense scrutiny, hype, and fear over the past three months, and the dramatic arrest on Monday of bitcoin advocate and entrepreneur Charlie Shrem on charges of money laundering threatened to cast a shadow over proceedings. Despite this, both meetings were largely forward-looking, and indicate that regulators, bitcoin leaders, and traditional banks are on a path to cooperation.
The New York Department of Financial Services hearings were called by Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky, who throughout the hearings displayed a deep understanding of, and even enthusiasm for, bitcoin and the protocol supporting it. Lawsky opened the meeting by reassuring the room that "our agency approaches the issue of virtual currencies without any prejudgements." The Shrem arrest, though alluded to several times, took a back seat to discussion of more fundamental questions, with Lawsky stating that "no industry should be defined entirely by its bad actors."
Representatives of the bitcoin world generally took the position that while regulations unique to bitcoin and other math-based currencies should be kept as minimal as possible, clarification of reporting requirements and anti-money-laundering standards would in fact be welcome. Many saw the appropriate focus for regulation to be the various points where bitcoins become dollars. Fred Wilson, a bitcoin investor with Union Square Ventures, flatly stated that "we should not regulate how the [bitcoin] system works" internally. But Fred Ehrsam, co-founder of the bitcoin brokerage Coinbase, emphasized that consumer protection in bitcoin-for-dollar sales was essential to broader adoption, and that "[Coinbase] welcome(s) appropriate guardrails to ensure that bitcoin companies handling the money of others are run by reputable individuals and have appropriate practices to create a sound consumer experience."
The benefits of regulation were highlighted by the testimony of law enforcement officials, whose dim view of cryptocurrency seemed to indicate increased risk for bitcoin operators. Deputy U.S. Attorney Richard B. Zabel equated bitcoin itself with both the unrelated electronic money-laundering service Liberty Reserve, and with Silk Road, the online contraband marketplace that accepted payment in bitcoin. Of course, as Jeremy Liew of Lightspeed Venture Partners had pointed out earlier in the hearing, Silk Road has been shut down quite effectively under existing regulations -- one reason why, as Zabel revealed, the U.S. Attorney's office has become a large holder of bitcoin through civil forfeiture. Even those who most fear bitcoin's potential for misuse, it seems, now have a stake in its success.
Directly after the first round of NYDFS hearings on Tuesday, some panelists headed to a similar meeting hosted by Wells Fargo in New York, though this one was closed-door. Attendees described it as organized but not dominated by representatives from the San Francisco-based bank's merchant services, marketing, and regulatory divisions, who mostly listened to a lineup of speakers giving a crash course in bitcoin. "All in all it was pretty basic, but the panel was insightful for the beginner," observed Rik Willard, who runs the bitcoin startup incubator MintCombine and was at the Wells Fargo meeting.
Wells Fargo (WFC) has a reputation as one of the most progressive large banks in adopting new payment technologies, and though no statements were made about Wells Fargo's plans, simply holding the meetings positions it as a leader in integration between bitcoin services and conventional banking. That process has been slowed by banking compliance officers' nervousness about bitcoin's association with criminal activity, and the scarcity of banking access for American bitcoin services is one of the major reasons it remains difficult to buy bitcoin with U.S. dollars. Currently, Coinbase is the only U.S.-based service that sells bitcoin for dollars and is serviced by a conventional bank, though it has declined to name its servicer. Wells Fargo's seeming openness to bitcoin may signal new opportunities to develop exchange infrastructures, which would in turn greatly ease mass adoption of bitcoin payments.
More than anything, this kind of high-level discussion of bitcoin shows that it is being taken seriously by leaders across many sectors, primarily as a promising innovation in payments. But there was little insight to be gained from this week's meetings about what the pace of regulation and mainstreaming will, or should, be. Superintendent Lawsky has indicated his office's intention to propose a regulatory framework for digital currency in 2014, but it is uncertain when those might go into effect, leaving significant time for unfettered innovation and risk.
This slow rollout is in line with past regulator behavior. Anil D. Aggarwal, a payment-systems entrepreneur monitoring developments in bitcoin, observed that legislators and regulators of new payments products often "give innovations the opportunity to gain traction and scale. Then they'll legislate and regulate at appropriate times in the evolution of the product. Having hearings of this kind demonstrate that." In the NYFSD hearing, a similar point was made by Judie Rinearson, an attorney working with emerging payment systems and representing several bitcoin-related firms. Rinearson recalled the delay in federal regulation of prepaid cards in the 1990s, which allowed for innovation and experimentation both in prepaid services and in state-level regulation of them, helping them gain their current widespread acceptance as a financial service.
A quite different tone, though, was struck by Carol van Cleef, an attorney specializing in financial regulation, who urged Lawsky and his panel toward speed in establishing standards. "Time is of the essence," van Cleef exhorted. "Innovation will adapt to new regulation, but it will not wait for regulation. [Bitcoin service development] will shift to other jurisdictions, taking jobs and the resulting wealth with it. The true losers will be U.S. residents."